English lesson plan · 11th grade (Year 12 in England) · 60 minutes
Evaluating research sources: primary vs secondary, authority, purpose
Reading Comprehension
CCSS W.11-12.8CCSS RI.11-12.7England: A-level Extended Project (research skills)England: AP Seminar and ResearchEngland: GCSE English Language Paper 2
Objective and success criteria
Students will: Evaluating research sources: primary vs secondary, authority, purpose.
- I can answer questions on today's skill on my own, without help.
- I can explain each step and say why it works.
- I can check my answer and spot a mistake.
Before and after
Needs first: Checking claims online: lateral reading and tracing sources; Bias and loaded language in reporting
Leads to: Evaluating AI-generated and edited media; Paraphrase, quotation or plagiarism?
Materials: A short text or extract (one copy each), Highlighters, Question cards, Mini whiteboards, A short model text on the board, Printed student sheet (below).
Warm-up · 6 min
- Quick retrieval from earlier learning (Checking claims online: lateral reading and tracing sources; Bias and loaded language in reporting). Students answer on mini whiteboards.
- Show answers together and note who needs support in the main task.
- Is the proposed answer correct? A news story is shared today, but the article is dated four years ago. Why does this matter? → it may present old events as if they are happening now (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → yes, it is correctPrompt: Good checkers leave the page and see what other reliable sources say.
- Is the proposed answer correct? Which phrase is the most NEUTRAL way to describe the same people? → heroes (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → no, it is not correctPrompt: Look for words that judge rather than describe.
- Is the proposed answer correct? A dramatic photo is going viral with the caption "Flooding in our city today". How can you check it? → zoom in to see if it looks wet (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → no, it is not correctPrompt: Good checkers leave the page and see what other reliable sources say.
Hook · 6 min
- Read the first lines of a short text aloud and ask what students predict will happen and why.
- Share the objective: Evaluating research sources: primary vs secondary, authority, purpose. Read the success criteria together.
I do: model it · 12 min
- Work through the example out loud, saying why you do each step, not just what you do.
- Example: For a research project, is this usually a primary or a secondary source? a photograph taken at a 1963 protest march
- Step 1: Primary sources are first-hand evidence; secondary sources interpret or summarise primary sources.
- Step 2: Created at the event itself.
- Step 3: So the answer is: primary source
- Answer: primary source
- Pause after each step and ask a student to say what comes next.
We do: guided practice · 12 min
- Do these together. Students try each step on whiteboards before you reveal it.
- Use the hints as prompts rather than giving the answer.
- For a research project, is this usually a primary or a secondary source? a documentary about the 1963 protest that interviews historians (primary source / secondary source) → secondary sourcePrompt: Was it created at the time, by someone directly involved?
- Read the question and choose. Which detail best shows that a website is accountable for its content? (it has thousands of followers / it uses a professional-looking logo / it names its authors and editors and publishes corrections / it has lots of adverts) → it names its authors and editors and publishes correctionsPrompt: Think about authority (who made it), currency (when), purpose (why) and evidence (how).
You do: independent practice · 17 min
- Students work on the student sheet. Circulate and check the first two answers of every student early.
- Students who finish: write a question of their own for a partner, with the answer.
The 8 questions are on the student sheet below, with answers in the key.
Exit ticket · 7 min
- Two questions on their own. Sort answers into got it / nearly / not yet to plan the next lesson.
- Read the question and choose. Which detail best shows that a website is accountable for its content? (it uses a professional-looking logo / it has lots of adverts / it has thousands of followers / it names its authors and editors and publishes corrections) → it names its authors and editors and publishes correctionsPrompt: Think about authority (who made it), currency (when), purpose (why) and evidence (how).
- For a research project, is this usually a primary or a secondary source? a review of a new film (primary source / secondary source) → secondary sourcePrompt: Was it created at the time, by someone directly involved?
Watch out for
- Answering from memory or opinion instead of evidence in the text.
- Copying a long quote without explaining what it shows.
Support and stretch
Support
- Review first: Checking claims online: lateral reading and tracing sources.
- Use concrete materials: a short text or extract (one copy each).
- Give the first step of each question, or a partly worked example to finish.
- Pair with a confident partner for the guided practice.
Stretch
- Move on to: Evaluating AI-generated and edited media; Paraphrase, quotation or plagiarism?.
- Explain a common mistake in writing and how to fix it.
- Write a word problem that uses today's skill, then solve a partner's.
Homework and more practice
Free online practice with hints and printable worksheets for this skill: eurekami.com/english/grade-11.
Free lesson plan from eurekami.com/lesson-plan-builder