Back to the lesson plan builder
Lesson length30 min45 min60 min

Print the plan for yourself; the student sheet prints on its own page after it.

Science lesson plan · 11th grade (Year 12 in England) · 60 minutes

Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints)

Working scientifically

CCSS NGSS.SEP 7CCSS NGSS.SEP 8England: KS4 Working scientifically

Objective and success criteria

Students will: Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints).

  • I can answer questions on today's skill on my own, without help.
  • I can explain each step and say why it works.
  • I can check my answer and spot a mistake.

Before and after

Needs first: Evaluating experiments (research summaries)

Leads to: the next skill in this area.

Materials: Simple equipment for a fair test, Results table template, Mini whiteboards, A diagram or short video clip of the idea, Printed student sheet (below).

Warm-up · 6 min

  • Quick retrieval from earlier learning (Evaluating experiments (research summaries)). Students answer on mini whiteboards.
  • Show answers together and note who needs support in the main task.
  1. Experiment 1: Magnesium ribbon was added to hydrochloric acid at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mol/dm³ at 25 °C, and the gas volume after 1 minute was measured. Experiment 2: The 1.0 mol/dm³ acid was used at 15 °C, 25 °C and 35 °C. In Experiment 2, which variable was changed on purpose? (the colour of the magnesium / the acid concentration / the volume of gas after 1 minute / the temperature) → the temperaturePrompt: Look only at the description of Experiment 2.
  2. Experiment 1: A pendulum with a 0.5 kg bob was timed for 10 swings with string lengths of 0.25 m, 0.50 m and 1.00 m. Experiment 2: A 1.00 m pendulum was timed with bobs of 0.1 kg, 0.5 kg and 1.0 kg. Which variable was kept constant in Experiment 2 but changed in Experiment 1? (the temperature of the room / the time for 10 swings / the string length / the mass of the bob) → the string lengthPrompt: What was tested in Experiment 1?
  3. Hypothesis: "Plants grow faster in blue light than in red light." Which experiment tests it best? (One plant in blue light outdoors and one in red light indoors / Plants in blue light only / Different species under the same lamp / Identical plants under blue or red lamps of equal brightness, same water and temperature) → Identical plants under blue or red lamps of equal brightness, same water and temperaturePrompt: Only the colour of light should differ.

Hook · 6 min

  • Show a simple experiment with one thing changed and ask what makes it a fair test.
  • Share the objective: Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints). Read the success criteria together.

I do: model it · 12 min

  • Work through the example out loud, saying why you do each step, not just what you do.
  • Example: Two students explain why a ball rolling on a flat floor eventually stops. Student 1: Objects naturally slow down and stop when nothing keeps pushing them. Student 2: Friction and air resistance act against the motion; with no resistive forces, the ball would keep moving at a steady speed. Which student's view agrees with Newton's first law?
  • Step 1: Newton's first law: an object keeps moving at constant velocity unless a resultant force acts.
  • Step 2: So the answer is: Student 2
  • Answer: Student 2
  • Pause after each step and ask a student to say what comes next.

We do: guided practice · 12 min

  • Do these together. Students try each step on whiteboards before you reveal it.
  • Use the hints as prompts rather than giving the answer.
  1. Peer review means… (the result can never be questioned / the scientist checks their own work only / friends vote on the result / other scientists check work before it is published) → other scientists check work before it is publishedPrompt: "Peers" are other experts in the same field.
  2. Two students explain why a metal spoon in hot soup feels hotter than a wooden spoon in the same soup. Student 1: The metal spoon is at a higher temperature than the wooden spoon. Student 2: Both spoons reach a similar temperature at the end in the soup, but metal conducts thermal energy into your hand much faster, so it feels hotter. Which student's explanation depends on how fast energy is transferred? (Student 1 / Neither student / Both students / Student 2) → Student 2Prompt: Read each viewpoint and underline its key claim.

You do: independent practice · 17 min

  • Students work on the student sheet. Circulate and check the first two answers of every student early.
  • Students who finish: write a question of their own for a partner, with the answer.

The 8 questions are on the student sheet below, with answers in the key.

Exit ticket · 7 min

  • Two questions on their own. Sort answers into got it / nearly / not yet to plan the next lesson.
  1. Peer review means… (the scientist checks their own work only / the result can never be questioned / other scientists check work before it is published / friends vote on the result) → other scientists check work before it is publishedPrompt: "Peers" are other experts in the same field.
  2. Two scientists explain why the Moon shows phases. Scientist 1: Earth's shadow covers different amounts of the Moon during the month. Scientist 2: Half of the Moon is always lit by the Sun; as the Moon orbits Earth, we see different amounts of the lit half. Earth's shadow is only on the Moon during a lunar eclipse, which happens at full moon. This evidence weakens… (neither scientist / both scientists / Scientist 2 / Scientist 1) → Scientist 1Prompt: Read each viewpoint and underline its key claim.

Watch out for

  • Everyday meanings of words getting in the way of the science meaning: define key words explicitly.
  • Remembering facts without the reason: ask "why?" and "what is the evidence?"

Support and stretch

Support

  • Review first: Evaluating experiments (research summaries).
  • Use concrete materials: simple equipment for a fair test.
  • Give the first step of each question, or a partly worked example to finish.
  • Pair with a confident partner for the guided practice.

Stretch

  • Explain a common mistake in writing and how to fix it.
  • Write a word problem that uses today's skill, then solve a partner's.

Homework and more practice

Free online practice with hints and printable worksheets for this skill: eurekami.com/science/grade-11.

Free lesson plan from eurekami.com/lesson-plan-builder

eurekami

Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints)

Name

Date

Score/ 8

  1. Question 1

    Two students explain why a metal spoon in hot soup feels hotter than a wooden spoon in the same soup. Student 1: The metal spoon is at a higher temperature than the wooden spoon. Student 2: Both spoons reach a similar temperature at the end in the soup, but metal conducts thermal energy into your hand much faster, so it feels hotter. A thermometer shows the tips of both spoons in the soup at the same temperature. This result supports…

    • A. both students equally
    • B. Student 1
    • C. neither student
    • D. Student 2
  2. Question 2

    A new observation contradicts a well-tested theory. What usually happens?

    • A. The observation is always thrown away
    • B. The theory is never changed
    • C. Science stops
    • D. Scientists check the observation, then improve or replace the theory if it holds up
  3. Question 3

    Two students explain why a metal spoon in hot soup feels hotter than a wooden spoon in the same soup. Student 1: The metal spoon is at a higher temperature than the wooden spoon. Student 2: Both spoons reach a similar temperature at the end in the soup, but metal conducts thermal energy into your hand much faster, so it feels hotter. Which student's explanation depends on how fast energy is transferred?

    • A. Neither student
    • B. Student 2
    • C. Student 1
    • D. Both students
  4. Question 4

    Two students explain why a ball rolling on a flat floor eventually stops. Student 1: Objects naturally slow down and stop when nothing keeps pushing them. Student 2: Friction and air resistance act against the motion; with no resistive forces, the ball would keep moving at a steady speed. The ball rolls much further on smooth ice than on carpet. This result…

    • A. shows friction makes things faster
    • B. supports neither student
    • C. supports Student 2
    • D. supports Student 1
  5. Question 5

    Two hypotheses explain the same data. How can scientists decide between them?

    • A. Ignore the data
    • B. Vote on them
    • C. Design an experiment where they predict different results
    • D. Choose the shorter one
  6. Question 6

    What makes a scientific explanation stronger than another?

    • A. More people like it
    • B. It is older
    • C. It explains more of the evidence and makes predictions that are confirmed
    • D. It is more complicated
  7. Question 7

    Two scientists explain why the Moon shows phases. Scientist 1: Earth's shadow covers different amounts of the Moon during the month. Scientist 2: Half of the Moon is always lit by the Sun; as the Moon orbits Earth, we see different amounts of the lit half. Which scientist's explanation is accepted by astronomers today?

    • A. both
    • B. Scientist 1
    • C. neither
    • D. Scientist 2
  8. Question 8

    Peer review means…

    • A. other scientists check work before it is published
    • B. friends vote on the result
    • C. the result can never be questioned
    • D. the scientist checks their own work only

Free from eurekami.com

for the adult only

Answer key: Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints)

  1. 1. D. Student 2

  2. 2. D. Scientists check the observation, then improve or replace the theory if it holds up

  3. 3. B. Student 2

  4. 4. C. supports Student 2

  5. 5. C. Design an experiment where they predict different results

  6. 6. C. It explains more of the evidence and makes predictions that are confirmed

  7. 7. D. Scientist 2

  8. 8. A. other scientists check work before it is published