Science lesson plan · 11th grade (Year 12 in England) · 45 minutes
Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints)
Working scientifically
CCSS NGSS.SEP 7CCSS NGSS.SEP 8England: KS4 Working scientifically
Objective and success criteria
Students will: Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints).
- I can answer questions on today's skill on my own, without help.
- I can explain each step and say why it works.
- I can check my answer and spot a mistake.
Before and after
Needs first: Evaluating experiments (research summaries)
Leads to: the next skill in this area.
Materials: Simple equipment for a fair test, Results table template, Mini whiteboards, A diagram or short video clip of the idea, Printed student sheet (below).
Warm-up · 5 min
- Quick retrieval from earlier learning (Evaluating experiments (research summaries)). Students answer on mini whiteboards.
- Show answers together and note who needs support in the main task.
- Experiment 1: A pendulum with a 0.5 kg bob was timed for 10 swings with string lengths of 0.25 m, 0.50 m and 1.00 m. Experiment 2: A 1.00 m pendulum was timed with bobs of 0.1 kg, 0.5 kg and 1.0 kg. In Experiment 2, which variable was changed on purpose? (the mass of the bob / the string length / the temperature of the room / the time for 10 swings) → the mass of the bobPrompt: Look only at the description of Experiment 2.
- Experiment 1: A student dropped the same ball from heights of 0.5 m, 1.0 m and 1.5 m onto a wooden floor and measured the bounce height. Experiment 2: The student dropped the same ball from 1.0 m onto wood, carpet and concrete. Which variable was kept constant in Experiment 2 but changed in Experiment 1? (the bounce height / the floor surface / the drop height / the mass of the ball) → the drop heightPrompt: What was tested in Experiment 1?
- A study finds a result with only 3 samples. What is the best next step? (Repeat with a larger sample / Use fewer samples / Publish it as proof / Change the data) → Repeat with a larger samplePrompt: Small samples can give misleading results.
Hook · 5 min
- Show a simple experiment with one thing changed and ask what makes it a fair test.
- Share the objective: Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints). Read the success criteria together.
I do: model it · 10 min
- Work through the example out loud, saying why you do each step, not just what you do.
- Example: Two students explain why a ball rolling on a flat floor eventually stops. Student 1: Objects naturally slow down and stop when nothing keeps pushing them. Student 2: Friction and air resistance act against the motion; with no resistive forces, the ball would keep moving at a steady speed. Which student's view agrees with Newton's first law?
- Step 1: Newton's first law: an object keeps moving at constant velocity unless a resultant force acts.
- Step 2: So the answer is: Student 2
- Answer: Student 2
- Pause after each step and ask a student to say what comes next.
We do: guided practice · 10 min
- Do these together. Students try each step on whiteboards before you reveal it.
- Use the hints as prompts rather than giving the answer.
- What makes a scientific explanation stronger than another? (It explains more of the evidence and makes predictions that are confirmed / It is older / It is more complicated / More people like it) → It explains more of the evidence and makes predictions that are confirmedPrompt: Scientists judge ideas by evidence.
- Two students explain why a ball rolling on a flat floor eventually stops. Student 1: Objects naturally slow down and stop when nothing keeps pushing them. Student 2: Friction and air resistance act against the motion; with no resistive forces, the ball would keep moving at a steady speed. Which student's view agrees with Newton's first law? (Both / Neither / Student 2 / Student 1) → Student 2Prompt: Read each viewpoint and underline its key claim.
You do: independent practice · 10 min
- Students work on the student sheet. Circulate and check the first two answers of every student early.
- Students who finish: write a question of their own for a partner, with the answer.
The 8 questions are on the student sheet below, with answers in the key.
Exit ticket · 5 min
- Two questions on their own. Sort answers into got it / nearly / not yet to plan the next lesson.
- A new observation contradicts a well-tested theory. What usually happens? (The observation is always thrown away / The theory is never changed / Scientists check the observation, then improve or replace the theory if it holds up / Science stops) → Scientists check the observation, then improve or replace the theory if it holds upPrompt: Science changes when evidence changes.
- Two scientists explain why the Moon shows phases. Scientist 1: Earth's shadow covers different amounts of the Moon during the month. Scientist 2: Half of the Moon is always lit by the Sun; as the Moon orbits Earth, we see different amounts of the lit half. Earth's shadow is only on the Moon during a lunar eclipse, which happens at full moon. This evidence weakens… (Scientist 1 / Scientist 2 / both scientists / neither scientist) → Scientist 1Prompt: Read each viewpoint and underline its key claim.
Watch out for
- Everyday meanings of words getting in the way of the science meaning: define key words explicitly.
- Remembering facts without the reason: ask "why?" and "what is the evidence?"
Support and stretch
Support
- Review first: Evaluating experiments (research summaries).
- Use concrete materials: simple equipment for a fair test.
- Give the first step of each question, or a partly worked example to finish.
- Pair with a confident partner for the guided practice.
Stretch
- Explain a common mistake in writing and how to fix it.
- Write a word problem that uses today's skill, then solve a partner's.
Homework and more practice
Free online practice with hints and printable worksheets for this skill: eurekami.com/science/grade-11.
Free lesson plan from eurekami.com/lesson-plan-builder