Back to the lesson plan builder
Lesson length30 min45 min60 min

Print the plan for yourself; the student sheet prints on its own page after it.

Science lesson plan · 11th grade (Year 12 in England) · 30 minutes

Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints)

Working scientifically

CCSS NGSS.SEP 7CCSS NGSS.SEP 8England: KS4 Working scientifically

Objective and success criteria

Students will: Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints).

  • I can answer questions on today's skill on my own, without help.
  • I can explain each step and say why it works.
  • I can check my answer and spot a mistake.

Before and after

Needs first: Evaluating experiments (research summaries)

Leads to: the next skill in this area.

Materials: Simple equipment for a fair test, Results table template, Mini whiteboards, A diagram or short video clip of the idea, Printed student sheet (below).

Warm-up · 4 min

  • Quick retrieval from earlier learning (Evaluating experiments (research summaries)). Students answer on mini whiteboards.
  • Show answers together and note who needs support in the main task.
  1. Experiment 1: A pendulum with a 0.5 kg bob was timed for 10 swings with string lengths of 0.25 m, 0.50 m and 1.00 m. Experiment 2: A 1.00 m pendulum was timed with bobs of 0.1 kg, 0.5 kg and 1.0 kg. In Experiment 2, which variable was changed on purpose? (the time for 10 swings / the temperature of the room / the mass of the bob / the string length) → the mass of the bobPrompt: Look only at the description of Experiment 2.
  2. Experiment 1: Seeds were kept at 10 °C, 20 °C and 30 °C, all watered daily, and the number that germinated was counted. Experiment 2: Seeds were kept at 20 °C and given 0, 5 or 10 mL of water a day. Which variable was kept constant in Experiment 2 but changed in Experiment 1? (the number of seeds that germinated / the colour of the pots / the temperature / the volume of water) → the temperaturePrompt: What was tested in Experiment 1?
  3. Hypothesis: "Plants grow faster in blue light than in red light." Which experiment tests it best? (One plant in blue light outdoors and one in red light indoors / Different species under the same lamp / Plants in blue light only / Identical plants under blue or red lamps of equal brightness, same water and temperature) → Identical plants under blue or red lamps of equal brightness, same water and temperaturePrompt: Only the colour of light should differ.

Hook · 3 min

  • Show a simple experiment with one thing changed and ask what makes it a fair test.
  • Share the objective: Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints). Read the success criteria together.

I do: model it · 7 min

  • Work through the example out loud, saying why you do each step, not just what you do.
  • Example: Two students explain why a ball rolling on a flat floor eventually stops. Student 1: Objects naturally slow down and stop when nothing keeps pushing them. Student 2: Friction and air resistance act against the motion; with no resistive forces, the ball would keep moving at a steady speed. Which student's view agrees with Newton's first law?
  • Step 1: Newton's first law: an object keeps moving at constant velocity unless a resultant force acts.
  • Step 2: So the answer is: Student 2
  • Answer: Student 2
  • Pause after each step and ask a student to say what comes next.

We do: guided practice · 6 min

  • Do these together. Students try each step on whiteboards before you reveal it.
  • Use the hints as prompts rather than giving the answer.
  1. What makes a scientific explanation stronger than another? (More people like it / It is more complicated / It explains more of the evidence and makes predictions that are confirmed / It is older) → It explains more of the evidence and makes predictions that are confirmedPrompt: Scientists judge ideas by evidence.
  2. Two scientists explain why the Moon shows phases. Scientist 1: Earth's shadow covers different amounts of the Moon during the month. Scientist 2: Half of the Moon is always lit by the Sun; as the Moon orbits Earth, we see different amounts of the lit half. Which scientist's explanation is accepted by astronomers today? (neither / both / Scientist 2 / Scientist 1) → Scientist 2Prompt: Read each viewpoint and underline its key claim.

You do: independent practice · 7 min

  • Students work on the student sheet. Circulate and check the first two answers of every student early.
  • Students who finish: write a question of their own for a partner, with the answer.

The 6 questions are on the student sheet below, with answers in the key.

Exit ticket · 3 min

  • Two questions on their own. Sort answers into got it / nearly / not yet to plan the next lesson.
  1. Two students explain why a metal spoon in hot soup feels hotter than a wooden spoon in the same soup. Student 1: The metal spoon is at a higher temperature than the wooden spoon. Student 2: Both spoons reach a similar temperature at the end in the soup, but metal conducts thermal energy into your hand much faster, so it feels hotter. A thermometer shows the tips of both spoons in the soup at the same temperature. This result supports… (Student 1 / Student 2 / neither student / both students equally) → Student 2Prompt: Read each viewpoint and underline its key claim.
  2. Two scientists explain why the Moon shows phases. Scientist 1: Earth's shadow covers different amounts of the Moon during the month. Scientist 2: Half of the Moon is always lit by the Sun; as the Moon orbits Earth, we see different amounts of the lit half. Which scientist's explanation is accepted by astronomers today? (neither / both / Scientist 1 / Scientist 2) → Scientist 2Prompt: Read each viewpoint and underline its key claim.

Watch out for

  • Everyday meanings of words getting in the way of the science meaning: define key words explicitly.
  • Remembering facts without the reason: ask "why?" and "what is the evidence?"

Support and stretch

Support

  • Review first: Evaluating experiments (research summaries).
  • Use concrete materials: simple equipment for a fair test.
  • Give the first step of each question, or a partly worked example to finish.
  • Pair with a confident partner for the guided practice.

Stretch

  • Explain a common mistake in writing and how to fix it.
  • Write a word problem that uses today's skill, then solve a partner's.

Homework and more practice

Free online practice with hints and printable worksheets for this skill: eurekami.com/science/grade-11.

Free lesson plan from eurekami.com/lesson-plan-builder

eurekami

Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints)

Name

Date

Score/ 6

  1. Question 1

    Two scientists explain why the Moon shows phases. Scientist 1: Earth's shadow covers different amounts of the Moon during the month. Scientist 2: Half of the Moon is always lit by the Sun; as the Moon orbits Earth, we see different amounts of the lit half. Which scientist's explanation is accepted by astronomers today?

    • A. Scientist 1
    • B. neither
    • C. Scientist 2
    • D. both
  2. Question 2

    A new observation contradicts a well-tested theory. What usually happens?

    • A. The observation is always thrown away
    • B. Scientists check the observation, then improve or replace the theory if it holds up
    • C. Science stops
    • D. The theory is never changed
  3. Question 3

    Two scientists explain why the Moon shows phases. Scientist 1: Earth's shadow covers different amounts of the Moon during the month. Scientist 2: Half of the Moon is always lit by the Sun; as the Moon orbits Earth, we see different amounts of the lit half. Earth's shadow is only on the Moon during a lunar eclipse, which happens at full moon. This evidence weakens…

    • A. Scientist 1
    • B. neither scientist
    • C. Scientist 2
    • D. both scientists
  4. Question 4

    Two hypotheses explain the same data. How can scientists decide between them?

    • A. Ignore the data
    • B. Design an experiment where they predict different results
    • C. Vote on them
    • D. Choose the shorter one
  5. Question 5

    Two students explain why a ball rolling on a flat floor eventually stops. Student 1: Objects naturally slow down and stop when nothing keeps pushing them. Student 2: Friction and air resistance act against the motion; with no resistive forces, the ball would keep moving at a steady speed. The ball rolls much further on smooth ice than on carpet. This result…

    • A. shows friction makes things faster
    • B. supports neither student
    • C. supports Student 2
    • D. supports Student 1
  6. Question 6

    Peer review means…

    • A. the scientist checks their own work only
    • B. friends vote on the result
    • C. other scientists check work before it is published
    • D. the result can never be questioned

Free from eurekami.com

for the adult only

Answer key: Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints)

  1. 1. C. Scientist 2

  2. 2. B. Scientists check the observation, then improve or replace the theory if it holds up

  3. 3. A. Scientist 1

  4. 4. B. Design an experiment where they predict different results

  5. 5. C. supports Student 2

  6. 6. C. other scientists check work before it is published