Back to the lesson plan builder
Lesson length30 min45 min60 min

Print the plan for yourself; the student sheet prints on its own page after it.

Science lesson plan · 11th grade (Year 12 in England) · 30 minutes

Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints)

Working scientifically

CCSS NGSS.SEP 7CCSS NGSS.SEP 8England: KS4 Working scientifically

Objective and success criteria

Students will: Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints).

  • I can answer questions on today's skill on my own, without help.
  • I can explain each step and say why it works.
  • I can check my answer and spot a mistake.

Before and after

Needs first: Evaluating experiments (research summaries)

Leads to: the next skill in this area.

Materials: Simple equipment for a fair test, Results table template, Mini whiteboards, A diagram or short video clip of the idea, Printed student sheet (below).

Warm-up · 4 min

  • Quick retrieval from earlier learning (Evaluating experiments (research summaries)). Students answer on mini whiteboards.
  • Show answers together and note who needs support in the main task.
  1. Experiment 1: Magnesium ribbon was added to hydrochloric acid at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mol/dm³ at 25 °C, and the gas volume after 1 minute was measured. Experiment 2: The 1.0 mol/dm³ acid was used at 15 °C, 25 °C and 35 °C. In Experiment 2, which variable was changed on purpose? (the colour of the magnesium / the acid concentration / the temperature / the volume of gas after 1 minute) → the temperaturePrompt: Look only at the description of Experiment 2.
  2. Experiment 1: A student dropped the same ball from heights of 0.5 m, 1.0 m and 1.5 m onto a wooden floor and measured the bounce height. Experiment 2: The student dropped the same ball from 1.0 m onto wood, carpet and concrete. Which variable was kept constant in Experiment 2 but changed in Experiment 1? (the mass of the ball / the bounce height / the floor surface / the drop height) → the drop heightPrompt: What was tested in Experiment 1?
  3. A study finds a result with only 3 samples. What is the best next step? (Repeat with a larger sample / Publish it as proof / Change the data / Use fewer samples) → Repeat with a larger samplePrompt: Small samples can give misleading results.

Hook · 3 min

  • Show a simple experiment with one thing changed and ask what makes it a fair test.
  • Share the objective: Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints). Read the success criteria together.

I do: model it · 7 min

  • Work through the example out loud, saying why you do each step, not just what you do.
  • Example: Two students explain why a ball rolling on a flat floor eventually stops. Student 1: Objects naturally slow down and stop when nothing keeps pushing them. Student 2: Friction and air resistance act against the motion; with no resistive forces, the ball would keep moving at a steady speed. Which student's view agrees with Newton's first law?
  • Step 1: Newton's first law: an object keeps moving at constant velocity unless a resultant force acts.
  • Step 2: So the answer is: Student 2
  • Answer: Student 2
  • Pause after each step and ask a student to say what comes next.

We do: guided practice · 6 min

  • Do these together. Students try each step on whiteboards before you reveal it.
  • Use the hints as prompts rather than giving the answer.
  1. Peer review means… (the result can never be questioned / friends vote on the result / the scientist checks their own work only / other scientists check work before it is published) → other scientists check work before it is publishedPrompt: "Peers" are other experts in the same field.
  2. Two students explain why a metal spoon in hot soup feels hotter than a wooden spoon in the same soup. Student 1: The metal spoon is at a higher temperature than the wooden spoon. Student 2: Both spoons reach a similar temperature at the end in the soup, but metal conducts thermal energy into your hand much faster, so it feels hotter. Which student's explanation depends on how fast energy is transferred? (Neither student / Student 1 / Student 2 / Both students) → Student 2Prompt: Read each viewpoint and underline its key claim.

You do: independent practice · 7 min

  • Students work on the student sheet. Circulate and check the first two answers of every student early.
  • Students who finish: write a question of their own for a partner, with the answer.

The 6 questions are on the student sheet below, with answers in the key.

Exit ticket · 3 min

  • Two questions on their own. Sort answers into got it / nearly / not yet to plan the next lesson.
  1. Peer review means… (the scientist checks their own work only / friends vote on the result / the result can never be questioned / other scientists check work before it is published) → other scientists check work before it is publishedPrompt: "Peers" are other experts in the same field.
  2. Two students explain why a metal spoon in hot soup feels hotter than a wooden spoon in the same soup. Student 1: The metal spoon is at a higher temperature than the wooden spoon. Student 2: Both spoons reach a similar temperature at the end in the soup, but metal conducts thermal energy into your hand much faster, so it feels hotter. A thermometer shows the tips of both spoons in the soup at the same temperature. This result supports… (Student 2 / Student 1 / both students equally / neither student) → Student 2Prompt: Read each viewpoint and underline its key claim.

Watch out for

  • Everyday meanings of words getting in the way of the science meaning: define key words explicitly.
  • Remembering facts without the reason: ask "why?" and "what is the evidence?"

Support and stretch

Support

  • Review first: Evaluating experiments (research summaries).
  • Use concrete materials: simple equipment for a fair test.
  • Give the first step of each question, or a partly worked example to finish.
  • Pair with a confident partner for the guided practice.

Stretch

  • Explain a common mistake in writing and how to fix it.
  • Write a word problem that uses today's skill, then solve a partner's.

Homework and more practice

Free online practice with hints and printable worksheets for this skill: eurekami.com/science/grade-11.

Free lesson plan from eurekami.com/lesson-plan-builder

eurekami

Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints)

Name

Date

Score/ 6

  1. Question 1

    Two scientists explain why some lakes have fewer fish than ten years ago. Scientist 1: Farm fertiliser washed into the lakes caused algae to grow; when the algae died, bacteria used up the oxygen in the water. Scientist 2: Warmer water from climate change holds less dissolved oxygen, so fewer fish survive. A lake far from any farm also lost fish as it warmed. This supports…

    • A. neither scientist
    • B. Scientist 1
    • C. Scientist 2
    • D. only that fertiliser is harmless
  2. Question 2

    Two scientists explain why some lakes have fewer fish than ten years ago. Scientist 1: Farm fertiliser washed into the lakes caused algae to grow; when the algae died, bacteria used up the oxygen in the water. Scientist 2: Warmer water from climate change holds less dissolved oxygen, so fewer fish survive. What do both scientists agree on?

    • A. The water is getting colder.
    • B. Low oxygen in the water harms the fish.
    • C. Fish numbers have increased.
    • D. Fertiliser is the only cause.
  3. Question 3

    What makes a scientific explanation stronger than another?

    • A. More people like it
    • B. It explains more of the evidence and makes predictions that are confirmed
    • C. It is older
    • D. It is more complicated
  4. Question 4

    Two scientists explain why the Moon shows phases. Scientist 1: Earth's shadow covers different amounts of the Moon during the month. Scientist 2: Half of the Moon is always lit by the Sun; as the Moon orbits Earth, we see different amounts of the lit half. Earth's shadow is only on the Moon during a lunar eclipse, which happens at full moon. This evidence weakens…

    • A. Scientist 1
    • B. both scientists
    • C. Scientist 2
    • D. neither scientist
  5. Question 5

    Two students explain why a metal spoon in hot soup feels hotter than a wooden spoon in the same soup. Student 1: The metal spoon is at a higher temperature than the wooden spoon. Student 2: Both spoons reach a similar temperature at the end in the soup, but metal conducts thermal energy into your hand much faster, so it feels hotter. Which student's explanation depends on how fast energy is transferred?

    • A. Student 2
    • B. Student 1
    • C. Both students
    • D. Neither student
  6. Question 6

    Two hypotheses explain the same data. How can scientists decide between them?

    • A. Choose the shorter one
    • B. Design an experiment where they predict different results
    • C. Ignore the data
    • D. Vote on them

Free from eurekami.com

for the adult only

Answer key: Comparing scientific explanations (conflicting viewpoints)

  1. 1. C. Scientist 2

  2. 2. B. Low oxygen in the water harms the fish.

  3. 3. B. It explains more of the evidence and makes predictions that are confirmed

  4. 4. A. Scientist 1

  5. 5. A. Student 2

  6. 6. B. Design an experiment where they predict different results