• Quick retrieval from earlier learning (Thesis statements and supporting evidence; The Toulmin model: claim, grounds, warrant, backing, qualifier, rebuttal). Students answer on mini whiteboards.
• Show answers together and note who needs support in the main task.

1. Which part of the Toulmin model matches this description? The position the arguer wants the audience to accept. (qualifier / rebuttal / warrant / claim) → claimPrompt: Ask what job each part does: state, prove, connect, support the connection, limit, or admit exceptions.
2. Thesis: Learning a second language benefits young children. Which is the most convincing supporting evidence? (Languages have different alphabets. / Children like songs. / Research suggests bilingual children often perform better on tasks requiring attention and switching between rules. / Spanish is spoken in many countries.) → Research suggests bilingual children often perform better on tasks requiring attention and switching between rules.Prompt: A strong thesis takes a clear, arguable position and hints at the reasons.
3. Which part of a Toulmin argument is this sentence? Separating cyclists from traffic reduces collisions. (rebuttal / warrant / claim / qualifier) → warrantPrompt: Is it the position itself, a piece of evidence, the link between them, support for that link, a limiting word like 'in most cases', or an 'unless'?

• Show two openings to the same piece of writing and ask which makes them want to read on.
• Share the objective: Is it an arguable thesis?. Read the success criteria together.

• Work through the example out loud, saying why you do each step, not just what you do.
• Example: What kind of statement is this, as the thesis of an essay? This essay is about the novel 'Frankenstein'.
• Step 1: A strong thesis is arguable, specific and often previews its reasons; facts, vague generalisations and topic announcements are not theses.
• Step 2: It announces the subject only.
• Step 3: So the answer is: an announcement of the topic
• Answer: an announcement of the topic
• Pause after each step and ask a student to say what comes next.

• Do these together. Students try each step on whiteboards before you reveal it.
• Use the hints as prompts rather than giving the answer.

1. What kind of statement is this, as the thesis of an essay? Cities should prioritise protected cycle lanes over new car parks, because they reduce congestion and pollution at lower cost. (arguable, specific thesis / just a fact / too broad or vague / an announcement of the topic) → arguable, specific thesisPrompt: Could a reasonable person disagree with it? If not, it's a fact or an announcement.
2. Which statement is this: arguable, specific thesis? (The Second World War ended in 1945. / Technology is good and bad. / Cities should prioritise protected cycle lanes over new car parks, because they reduce congestion and pollution at lower cost.) → Cities should prioritise protected cycle lanes over new car parks, because they reduce congestion and pollution at lower cost.Prompt: Could a reasonable person disagree with it? If not, it's a fact or an announcement.

• Students work on the student sheet. Circulate and check the first two answers of every student early.
• Students who finish: write a question of their own for a partner, with the answer.

The 6 questions are on the student sheet below, with answers in the key.

• Two questions on their own. Sort answers into got it / nearly / not yet to plan the next lesson.

1. What kind of statement is this, as the thesis of an essay? Schools should replace one hour of screen time a day with outdoor learning, because it improves both concentration and wellbeing. (arguable, specific thesis / just a fact / too broad or vague / an announcement of the topic) → arguable, specific thesisPrompt: Could a reasonable person disagree with it? If not, it's a fact or an announcement.
2. Which statement is this: arguable, specific thesis? (In this essay I will talk about climate change. / Water boils at 100 °C at sea level. / Cities should prioritise protected cycle lanes over new car parks, because they reduce congestion and pollution at lower cost.) → Cities should prioritise protected cycle lanes over new car parks, because they reduce congestion and pollution at lower cost.Prompt: Could a reasonable person disagree with it? If not, it's a fact or an announcement.

Free online practice with hints and printable worksheets for this skill: eurekami.com/english/grade-12.