English lesson plan · 9th grade (Year 10 in England) · 60 minutes
Spotting misleading statistics and graphs
Reading Comprehension
CCSS RI.9-10.7CCSS RI.9-10.8England: GCSE English Language Paper 2England: SAT Reading and Writing (Command of Evidence: Quantitative)England: GCSE Maths (statistics)
Objective and success criteria
Students will: Spotting misleading statistics and graphs.
- I can answer questions on today's skill on my own, without help.
- I can explain each step and say why it works.
- I can check my answer and spot a mistake.
Before and after
Needs first: Checking claims online: lateral reading and tracing sources; Is the evidence relevant and sufficient?
Leads to: Bias and loaded language in reporting; Does the study design support the claim?
Materials: A short text or extract (one copy each), Highlighters, Question cards, Mini whiteboards, A short model text on the board, Printed student sheet (below).
Warm-up · 6 min
- Quick retrieval from earlier learning (Checking claims online: lateral reading and tracing sources; Is the evidence relevant and sufficient?). Students answer on mini whiteboards.
- Show answers together and note who needs support in the main task.
- Is the proposed answer correct? A news story is shared today, but the article is dated four years ago. Why does this matter? → dates are only for decoration (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → no, it is not correctPrompt: Good checkers leave the page and see what other reliable sources say.
- Read the question and choose. A post says "A study proves X" but gives no link. What is the best next step? (assume it is true because it mentions a study / ignore all studies / search for the original study and see what it actually found / share it so experts can check) → search for the original study and see what it actually foundPrompt: Good checkers leave the page and see what other reliable sources say.
- Is the proposed answer correct? You strongly agree with a post and want to share it immediately. What's the wisest move? → pause and check it, because we are less careful with claims we already agree with (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → yes, it is correctPrompt: Good checkers leave the page and see what other reliable sources say.
Hook · 6 min
- Read the first lines of a short text aloud and ask what students predict will happen and why.
- Share the objective: Spotting misleading statistics and graphs. Read the success criteria together.
I do: model it · 12 min
- Work through the example out loud, saying why you do each step, not just what you do.
- Example: Read the question and choose. "9 out of 10 users loved our app!" The survey asked 10 people. What's the main problem?
- Step 1: Numbers can mislead through small or biased samples, cherry-picking, distorted graphs, misleading averages and confusing correlation with causation.
- Step 2: So the answer is: the sample is far too small to generalise
- Answer: the sample is far too small to generalise
- Pause after each step and ask a student to say what comes next.
We do: guided practice · 12 min
- Do these together. Students try each step on whiteboards before you reveal it.
- Use the hints as prompts rather than giving the answer.
- Is the proposed answer correct? "9 out of 10 users loved our app!" The survey asked 10 people. What's the main problem? → surveys are always biased (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → no, it is not correctPrompt: Ask: how many people or cases is this based on, and who was asked?
- Read the question and choose. "The average salary at our company is £60,000!" But the boss earns £1 million and most staff earn £25,000. What's misleading? (one huge value pulls the mean up, so it doesn't show a typical salary / averages are always accurate / the boss's salary is illegal / £60,000 is too low) → one huge value pulls the mean up, so it doesn't show a typical salaryPrompt: Ask: how many people or cases is this based on, and who was asked?
You do: independent practice · 17 min
- Students work on the student sheet. Circulate and check the first two answers of every student early.
- Students who finish: write a question of their own for a partner, with the answer.
The 8 questions are on the student sheet below, with answers in the key.
Exit ticket · 7 min
- Two questions on their own. Sort answers into got it / nearly / not yet to plan the next lesson.
- Is the proposed answer correct? A company shows only the three months when its sales rose and leaves out the nine months when they fell. What is this called? → a fair summary (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → no, it is not correctPrompt: Ask: how many people or cases is this based on, and who was asked?
- Read the question and choose. "Towns with more ice-cream shops have more sunburn cases. So ice cream causes sunburn!" What's wrong? (there are too many shops / both are linked to hot, sunny weather; correlation doesn't prove cause / ice cream does cause sunburn / the numbers must be made up) → both are linked to hot, sunny weather; correlation doesn't prove causePrompt: Ask: how many people or cases is this based on, and who was asked?
Watch out for
- Answering from memory or opinion instead of evidence in the text.
- Copying a long quote without explaining what it shows.
Support and stretch
Support
- Review first: Checking claims online: lateral reading and tracing sources.
- Use concrete materials: a short text or extract (one copy each).
- Give the first step of each question, or a partly worked example to finish.
- Pair with a confident partner for the guided practice.
Stretch
- Move on to: Bias and loaded language in reporting; Does the study design support the claim?.
- Explain a common mistake in writing and how to fix it.
- Write a word problem that uses today's skill, then solve a partner's.
Homework and more practice
Free online practice with hints and printable worksheets for this skill: eurekami.com/english/grade-9.
Free lesson plan from eurekami.com/lesson-plan-builder