English lesson plan · 9th grade (Year 10 in England) · 45 minutes
Spotting misleading statistics and graphs
Reading Comprehension
CCSS RI.9-10.7CCSS RI.9-10.8England: GCSE English Language Paper 2England: SAT Reading and Writing (Command of Evidence: Quantitative)England: GCSE Maths (statistics)
Objective and success criteria
Students will: Spotting misleading statistics and graphs.
- I can answer questions on today's skill on my own, without help.
- I can explain each step and say why it works.
- I can check my answer and spot a mistake.
Before and after
Needs first: Checking claims online: lateral reading and tracing sources; Is the evidence relevant and sufficient?
Leads to: Bias and loaded language in reporting; Does the study design support the claim?
Materials: A short text or extract (one copy each), Highlighters, Question cards, Mini whiteboards, A short model text on the board, Printed student sheet (below).
Warm-up · 5 min
- Quick retrieval from earlier learning (Checking claims online: lateral reading and tracing sources; Is the evidence relevant and sufficient?). Students answer on mini whiteboards.
- Show answers together and note who needs support in the main task.
- Is the proposed answer correct? A quote is shared with a famous scientist's photo, but you can't find it in any of her speeches or writings. What should you conclude? → it may be made up or wrongly attributed, so don't share it (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → yes, it is correctPrompt: Good checkers leave the page and see what other reliable sources say.
- Read the question and choose. A post says "A study proves X" but gives no link. What is the best next step? (ignore all studies / search for the original study and see what it actually found / assume it is true because it mentions a study / share it so experts can check) → search for the original study and see what it actually foundPrompt: Good checkers leave the page and see what other reliable sources say.
- Is the proposed answer correct? A news story is shared today, but the article is dated four years ago. Why does this matter? → it may present old events as if they are happening now (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → yes, it is correctPrompt: Good checkers leave the page and see what other reliable sources say.
Hook · 5 min
- Read the first lines of a short text aloud and ask what students predict will happen and why.
- Share the objective: Spotting misleading statistics and graphs. Read the success criteria together.
I do: model it · 10 min
- Work through the example out loud, saying why you do each step, not just what you do.
- Example: Read the question and choose. "9 out of 10 users loved our app!" The survey asked 10 people. What's the main problem?
- Step 1: Numbers can mislead through small or biased samples, cherry-picking, distorted graphs, misleading averages and confusing correlation with causation.
- Step 2: So the answer is: the sample is far too small to generalise
- Answer: the sample is far too small to generalise
- Pause after each step and ask a student to say what comes next.
We do: guided practice · 10 min
- Do these together. Students try each step on whiteboards before you reveal it.
- Use the hints as prompts rather than giving the answer.
- Is the proposed answer correct? "Towns with more ice-cream shops have more sunburn cases. So ice cream causes sunburn!" What's wrong? → both are linked to hot, sunny weather; correlation doesn't prove cause (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → yes, it is correctPrompt: Ask: how many people or cases is this based on, and who was asked?
- Read the question and choose. "Crime fell by 50%!" It went from 2 incidents to 1 in a small village. What's the issue? (50% is calculated wrongly / a big percentage can hide a tiny real change / villages don't have crime / crime actually rose) → a big percentage can hide a tiny real changePrompt: Ask: how many people or cases is this based on, and who was asked?
You do: independent practice · 10 min
- Students work on the student sheet. Circulate and check the first two answers of every student early.
- Students who finish: write a question of their own for a partner, with the answer.
The 8 questions are on the student sheet below, with answers in the key.
Exit ticket · 5 min
- Two questions on their own. Sort answers into got it / nearly / not yet to plan the next lesson.
- Read the question and choose. An online poll on a cycling website finds 85% of people want more bike lanes. Why should we be careful? (85% is too high to be real / the people answering are not representative of everyone / online polls are illegal / bike lanes are popular everywhere) → the people answering are not representative of everyonePrompt: Ask: how many people or cases is this based on, and who was asked?
- Is the proposed answer correct? An online poll on a cycling website finds 85% of people want more bike lanes. Why should we be careful? → online polls are illegal (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → no, it is not correctPrompt: Ask: how many people or cases is this based on, and who was asked?
Watch out for
- Answering from memory or opinion instead of evidence in the text.
- Copying a long quote without explaining what it shows.
Support and stretch
Support
- Review first: Checking claims online: lateral reading and tracing sources.
- Use concrete materials: a short text or extract (one copy each).
- Give the first step of each question, or a partly worked example to finish.
- Pair with a confident partner for the guided practice.
Stretch
- Move on to: Bias and loaded language in reporting; Does the study design support the claim?.
- Explain a common mistake in writing and how to fix it.
- Write a word problem that uses today's skill, then solve a partner's.
Homework and more practice
Free online practice with hints and printable worksheets for this skill: eurekami.com/english/grade-9.
Free lesson plan from eurekami.com/lesson-plan-builder