English lesson plan · 9th grade (Year 10 in England) · 30 minutes
Spotting misleading statistics and graphs
Reading Comprehension
CCSS RI.9-10.7CCSS RI.9-10.8England: GCSE English Language Paper 2England: SAT Reading and Writing (Command of Evidence: Quantitative)England: GCSE Maths (statistics)
Objective and success criteria
Students will: Spotting misleading statistics and graphs.
- I can answer questions on today's skill on my own, without help.
- I can explain each step and say why it works.
- I can check my answer and spot a mistake.
Before and after
Needs first: Checking claims online: lateral reading and tracing sources; Is the evidence relevant and sufficient?
Leads to: Bias and loaded language in reporting; Does the study design support the claim?
Materials: A short text or extract (one copy each), Highlighters, Question cards, Mini whiteboards, A short model text on the board, Printed student sheet (below).
Warm-up · 4 min
- Quick retrieval from earlier learning (Checking claims online: lateral reading and tracing sources; Is the evidence relevant and sufficient?). Students answer on mini whiteboards.
- Show answers together and note who needs support in the main task.
- Is the proposed answer correct? You find a website about a health claim. You've never heard of the organisation behind it. What should you do first? → trust its 'About us' page (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → no, it is not correctPrompt: Good checkers leave the page and see what other reliable sources say.
- Read the question and choose. You find a website about a health claim. You've never heard of the organisation behind it. What should you do first? (judge it by how professional it looks / trust its 'About us' page / read the whole site carefully before checking anything else / open a new tab and search for what reliable sources say about that organisation) → open a new tab and search for what reliable sources say about that organisationPrompt: Good checkers leave the page and see what other reliable sources say.
- Is the proposed answer correct? You find a website about a health claim. You've never heard of the organisation behind it. What should you do first? → judge it by how professional it looks (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → no, it is not correctPrompt: Good checkers leave the page and see what other reliable sources say.
Hook · 3 min
- Read the first lines of a short text aloud and ask what students predict will happen and why.
- Share the objective: Spotting misleading statistics and graphs. Read the success criteria together.
I do: model it · 7 min
- Work through the example out loud, saying why you do each step, not just what you do.
- Example: Read the question and choose. "9 out of 10 users loved our app!" The survey asked 10 people. What's the main problem?
- Step 1: Numbers can mislead through small or biased samples, cherry-picking, distorted graphs, misleading averages and confusing correlation with causation.
- Step 2: So the answer is: the sample is far too small to generalise
- Answer: the sample is far too small to generalise
- Pause after each step and ask a student to say what comes next.
We do: guided practice · 6 min
- Do these together. Students try each step on whiteboards before you reveal it.
- Use the hints as prompts rather than giving the answer.
- Is the proposed answer correct? "The average salary at our company is £60,000!" But the boss earns £1 million and most staff earn £25,000. What's misleading? → the boss's salary is illegal (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → no, it is not correctPrompt: Ask: how many people or cases is this based on, and who was asked?
- Read the question and choose. "The average salary at our company is £60,000!" But the boss earns £1 million and most staff earn £25,000. What's misleading? (the boss's salary is illegal / averages are always accurate / one huge value pulls the mean up, so it doesn't show a typical salary / £60,000 is too low) → one huge value pulls the mean up, so it doesn't show a typical salaryPrompt: Ask: how many people or cases is this based on, and who was asked?
You do: independent practice · 7 min
- Students work on the student sheet. Circulate and check the first two answers of every student early.
- Students who finish: write a question of their own for a partner, with the answer.
The 6 questions are on the student sheet below, with answers in the key.
Exit ticket · 3 min
- Two questions on their own. Sort answers into got it / nearly / not yet to plan the next lesson.
- Is the proposed answer correct? A company shows only the three months when its sales rose and leaves out the nine months when they fell. What is this called? → cherry-picking data (yes, it is correct / no, it is not correct) → yes, it is correctPrompt: Ask: how many people or cases is this based on, and who was asked?
- Read the question and choose. "Since the new road opened, house prices have risen 10%." Why can't we say the road caused it? (house prices can't rise / roads never affect prices / prices may have risen everywhere for other reasons / 10% is a small number) → prices may have risen everywhere for other reasonsPrompt: Ask: how many people or cases is this based on, and who was asked?
Watch out for
- Answering from memory or opinion instead of evidence in the text.
- Copying a long quote without explaining what it shows.
Support and stretch
Support
- Review first: Checking claims online: lateral reading and tracing sources.
- Use concrete materials: a short text or extract (one copy each).
- Give the first step of each question, or a partly worked example to finish.
- Pair with a confident partner for the guided practice.
Stretch
- Move on to: Bias and loaded language in reporting; Does the study design support the claim?.
- Explain a common mistake in writing and how to fix it.
- Write a word problem that uses today's skill, then solve a partner's.
Homework and more practice
Free online practice with hints and printable worksheets for this skill: eurekami.com/english/grade-9.
Free lesson plan from eurekami.com/lesson-plan-builder